1982
DOI: 10.2307/1510295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being Known by the Company We Keep: The Contagion of First Impressions

Abstract: The purposes of the present study were (a) to replicate previous findings concerning naive judges' negative immediate impressions of learning disabled children, and (b) to explore whether such impressions were correlated with the impressions formed by other naive judges concerning a second child viewed in a dyadic peer-group interaction. College students were shown videotapes of second-or fourth-grade boys playing either a host or a guest role on a simulated television talk show. One half of the hosts had been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this interpretation is consistent with previous studies showing that the nonverbal behavior of normally achieving children while interacting with an LD classmate was viewed as more hostile and less relaxed than that of children interacting with a nondisabled child (Bryan, Bryan, & Sonnefeld, 1982;Bryan, Donahue, Pearl, & Sturm, 1981). Interestingly, this interpretation is consistent with previous studies showing that the nonverbal behavior of normally achieving children while interacting with an LD classmate was viewed as more hostile and less relaxed than that of children interacting with a nondisabled child (Bryan, Bryan, & Sonnefeld, 1982;Bryan, Donahue, Pearl, & Sturm, 1981).…”
Section: Learning Disabled Children's Metaconversational Knowledgesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Interestingly, this interpretation is consistent with previous studies showing that the nonverbal behavior of normally achieving children while interacting with an LD classmate was viewed as more hostile and less relaxed than that of children interacting with a nondisabled child (Bryan, Bryan, & Sonnefeld, 1982;Bryan, Donahue, Pearl, & Sturm, 1981). Interestingly, this interpretation is consistent with previous studies showing that the nonverbal behavior of normally achieving children while interacting with an LD classmate was viewed as more hostile and less relaxed than that of children interacting with a nondisabled child (Bryan, Bryan, & Sonnefeld, 1982;Bryan, Donahue, Pearl, & Sturm, 1981).…”
Section: Learning Disabled Children's Metaconversational Knowledgesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, some studies have found inappropriate and negative interpersonal styles to be characteristic of LD children (Bruininks, 1978;Bryan et al, 19761, whereas others have been unable to attribute disruptive classroom behavior to them (Bryan, 1974a;Bryan & Wheeler, 1972). It has been suggested by some that the social communication difficulties experienced by LDs are more related to nonassertive and passive behaviors rather than to provocative or negative interactions (Bryan, Bryan, & Sonnefeld, 1982;Bryan, Donahue, Pearl, & Strum, 1981). Considering the previous research that has consistently found inappropriate, negative, and aversive social behaviors to be characteristic of hyperactive children (e.g., Campbell, Endman, & Bernfeld, 1977;King & Young, 1981;Klein & Young, 1979;Pelham & Bender, 1982), the results of the present investigation stimulate concern that past LD research has been confounded by the unexplained contribution of hyperactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, given their lack of acceptance by peers and strangers alike (Bryan, 1974(Bryan, , 1976Bryan, Bryan, & Sonnefeld, 1982;Bryan & Perlmutter, 1979;Bryan & Sherman, 1980), it might reasonably be expected that their experiences would lead them to negative evaluations and the negative effects associated with such evaluations. Finally, and virtually by definition, they are frequently confronted with academic failuresanother experience likely to increase evaluation or test anxiety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%