2023
DOI: 10.54825/iolo6421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being women scholar-activists: Tensions between the neoliberal university and grassroots housing movements

Abstract: Research rarely unpicks the variety of experiences that exist between activists at different intersections. Our paper attends to this shortfall in literature, firstly through the lens of gendered experiences of labour in housing movements, and secondly through the lens of casualised gendered labour as scholar-activists in the neoliberal university. How we, and others, negotiate these everyday politics will be analysed to offer a more complete understanding of the nuances and tensions at play even in the most p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feasibility of AvR varies according to the different stages and labour and personal conditions in the academic career. Precarity in pay and career promotion, the privatisation of higher education, the commodification of academic publishing and conferences, racism and gender oppression (Bishop and O'Connor, 2023;Burawoy, 2014) all substantially hinder the prospects of both public sociology and AvR. More institutional support for AvR processes might certainly enhance its legitimacy, provide social benefits and better train scholar-activists despite co-optation and political neutralisation risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The feasibility of AvR varies according to the different stages and labour and personal conditions in the academic career. Precarity in pay and career promotion, the privatisation of higher education, the commodification of academic publishing and conferences, racism and gender oppression (Bishop and O'Connor, 2023;Burawoy, 2014) all substantially hinder the prospects of both public sociology and AvR. More institutional support for AvR processes might certainly enhance its legitimacy, provide social benefits and better train scholar-activists despite co-optation and political neutralisation risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deepen these discussions, it is useful to determine the specific oppressions and inequalities that the AvR process aims to address, but also those that may exist or arise among and between activists and academics. Overt discussion about the intersectional positionalities involved requires awareness, care and measures to deal with them in a sensitive manner (Bishop and O'Connor, 2023;Boilevin et al, 2019;McIntyre, 2008).…”
Section: Not One Single Method But a Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation