“…The diffraction pattern analysis of sample 1 after heating showed the following reflections on the diffraction curve, d/n, A (I/I 0 ): 4.004(46) (not identified), 3.340(15) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 2.998(31) (not identified), 2.930(65) (PdP 2 ), 2.878(94) (PdP 2 ), 2.722(100) (Pd 5 P 2 , PdP 2 ), 2.515(29) (Pd 5 P 2 , PdP 2 ), 2.448(15) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 2.284(32) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 2.122(31) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 2.111(37) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 2.080(38) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 2.052 (38) (PdP 2 ), 2.002(35) (PdP 2 ), 1.982(15) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 1.900 (23) (PdP 2 ), 1.838(33) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 1.795(31), 1.735(23) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 1.689(20) (PdP 2 ), 1.489(15) (not identified), 1.470(25) (Pd 5 P 2 , PdP 2 ) 1.367(15) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 1.349(11) (Pd 5 P 2 ), 1.308(11) (Pd 5 P 2 ). The reflections were assigned according to the known X-ray characteristics of PdP 2 [10] and Pd 5 P 2 (PDF 19-887) [25].…”