2012
DOI: 10.1007/bf03373892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belastung des Muskel-Skelett-Systems beim Ziehen und Schieben von Müllgroßbehältern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequency of task, task duration, and intensity, as well as population characteristics or the ambient temperature can influence the acceptable workload [3], [32], [33]. The proposed limits for maximum EHFs decrease from around 430N to less than 200N when task frequency augments from one per 8 hours to one per minute [2], [34]. Other limits like the widely acknowledged value for maximum working L5–S1 intervertebral disc compression of 3,400N are usually meant to be valid for young and healthy men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Frequency of task, task duration, and intensity, as well as population characteristics or the ambient temperature can influence the acceptable workload [3], [32], [33]. The proposed limits for maximum EHFs decrease from around 430N to less than 200N when task frequency augments from one per 8 hours to one per minute [2], [34]. Other limits like the widely acknowledged value for maximum working L5–S1 intervertebral disc compression of 3,400N are usually meant to be valid for young and healthy men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a more detailed assessment one study [17] was excluded due to similar content to a second study by the same author [2] and another one because it primarily focused on sex differences [18] . There were studies excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria ( Table 5 ) [5] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] . Thirteen studies were retained after reading the whole paper and submitted to assessment of their methodological quality ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations