2011
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.00270111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belatacept-versus Cyclosporine-Based Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients with Pre-existing Diabetes

Abstract: SummaryBackground and objectives Renal transplant recipients with pre-existing diabetes (PD) have reduced graft survival and increased risk of mortality and ischemic heart disease compared with nondiabetic transplant recipients. To assess the effect of belatacept in this high-risk group, we evaluated outcomes of the subpopulation with PD from previously published BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. ConclusionsIn post hoc analysis of patients with PD, patient/graft survival and renal function at 12 months were num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, belatacept-treated patients had better preservation of kidney function with a higher GFR than the cyclosporine-treated patients. In diabetic patients, there was an increase in patient and graft survival with belatacept, but this did not achieve statistical significance (Rostaing et al 2011). In each of the studies, there was an increased risk of PTLD with belatacept.…”
Section: Costimulatory Blockadementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, belatacept-treated patients had better preservation of kidney function with a higher GFR than the cyclosporine-treated patients. In diabetic patients, there was an increase in patient and graft survival with belatacept, but this did not achieve statistical significance (Rostaing et al 2011). In each of the studies, there was an increased risk of PTLD with belatacept.…”
Section: Costimulatory Blockadementioning
confidence: 82%
“…A number of trials have reported the outcomes of belatacept-based immunosuppression protocols in comparison to cyclosporine-based regimens. One-and 3-year outcomes have shown similar graft and patient survival between cyclosporine and belatacept protocols, but slightly more rejection with belatacept (Durrbach et al 2010;Vincenti et al 2010;Rostaing et al 2011;Pestana et al 2012). However, belatacept-treated patients had better preservation of kidney function with a higher GFR than the cyclosporine-treated patients.…”
Section: Costimulatory Blockadementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on the clinical course and biopsy findings, both cases clearly show that the poor renal function was due to TAC therapy. Belatacept has been studied extensively recently in kidney transplant patients (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Treatment with belatacept is associated with better renal function, less CAN and an improved cardiovascular risk factor profile compared with cyclosporine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belatacept, the first selective T cell costimulation blocker approved to prevent acute rejection in adult renal transplant recipients does not cause nephrotoxicity. Recent studies comparing regimens in which belatacept was used to either replace or reduce the dose of the CNI have shown success in low risk kidney transplant recipients (8,9). Furthermore, switching patients maintained on a CNI-based regimen to a belatacept-based regimen was shown to be effective in preventing the progression of kidney allograft dysfunction from CNI toxicity (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Patients were considered to have diabetes before transplantation if they reported a medical history of diabetes or were taking insulin or oral antidiabetic medication at the time of transplantation. At Figure 4 Mean eGFR in the BENEFIT-EXT study.…”
Section: Phase III Benefit-ext Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%