Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b19094-479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief function theory based decision support methods: Application to torrent protection work effectiveness and reliability assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of this article is to show how the use of new decisionaiding methods may be integrated into a formalised framework of analysis through the conceptual description of this analytical framework. This article does not aim at detailing mathematical aspects of such methods or at showing the real application of these individual methods on different sub-problems as already done elsewhere (Carladous et al, 2015(Carladous et al, , 2016c. Under this assumption, the Section 2 introduces the methods, didactically, without detailing calculation-intensive aspects but by justifying choices made.…”
Section: A Multi-scale Multi-component Decision-making Problem Based ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this article is to show how the use of new decisionaiding methods may be integrated into a formalised framework of analysis through the conceptual description of this analytical framework. This article does not aim at detailing mathematical aspects of such methods or at showing the real application of these individual methods on different sub-problems as already done elsewhere (Carladous et al, 2015(Carladous et al, , 2016c. Under this assumption, the Section 2 introduces the methods, didactically, without detailing calculation-intensive aspects but by justifying choices made.…”
Section: A Multi-scale Multi-component Decision-making Problem Based ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An expert assesses M = 4 check dam series A i according to their effectiveness given an imperfect evaluation of each C j and using ER-MCDA step 1. After this common step, ER-MCDA step 2 is used to assess (DMA1) the effectiveness of each A i expressed by four qualitative labels (levels) in Θ = {high, medium, low, no} [1]. Then steps 2 and 3 of the method based on BF-TOPSIS3 developed in section 3.4 are used to rank all A i and to choose the most effective one, A i (DMA2).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Torrential Check Dam Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, scoring each criterion is difficult and imperfect. Experts affect each check dam series to one of several qualitative evaluation classes of effectiveness (high, medium, low, no) [1]. Evidential Reasoning for Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (ER-MCDA) has been developed on the basis of fuzzy sets, possibility and belief function theories [2,3] to decide on such MCDM problems, taking into account imperfect assessment of criteria provided by several sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This evaluation is based on several criteria, such as the scouring rate (expressed in percentage) which is a damageable loss of foundation support 5 [2]. In this application context, the Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%