“…Yet others have more recently argued that the theoretical weaknesses of cultural distance can be attenuated through the identification of moderators or considering the mechanisms by which it relates to other constructs—an approach we use in this study (Zaheer, Schomaker, & Nachum, ). We also address the problem that most previous research examines only one aspect of cultural distance at a time (e.g., Hemmasi & Downes, ) or in a specific country (e.g., Lee, ; Pelled & Xin, ), which can make generalizations more difficult (Franke & Richey, ). We also improve face validity, as most studies do not capture actual supervisor, peer, or subordinate ratings, but use same source data to assess the expatriates’ “perceptions” of the “value congruence” between leaders’ home‐country cultures and host‐country cultures (Van Vianen, Pater, Kristof‐Brown, & Johnson, ).…”