2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Believe it or not: Moving non-biological stimuli believed to have human origin can be represented as human movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Point-light stimuli depicted an adult male performing salient social-interactive actions such as waving and playing peek-a-boo (Klin et al, 2009; Kaiser et al, 2010b). Critically, to avoid priming biases related to expectations of biological motion (Stanley et al, 2010; Zwickel et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2014; Gowen et al, 2016) participants were told that they would watch a series of short videos, but were given no additional details about the content of the videos and not explicitly informed that stimuli might depict biological motion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Point-light stimuli depicted an adult male performing salient social-interactive actions such as waving and playing peek-a-boo (Klin et al, 2009; Kaiser et al, 2010b). Critically, to avoid priming biases related to expectations of biological motion (Stanley et al, 2010; Zwickel et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2014; Gowen et al, 2016) participants were told that they would watch a series of short videos, but were given no additional details about the content of the videos and not explicitly informed that stimuli might depict biological motion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous studies used forced-choice discrimination paradigms (e.g., Thurman et al, 2016), it is well-known that instructing participants to identify an animate entity within a dynamic display biases viewing behavior and neural response toward this end (Stanley et al, 2010; Zwickel et al, 2012; Lee et al, 2014; Gowen et al, 2016). Therefore, we expect a passive viewing paradigm to evoke differences in participants' spontaneous tendency to globally perceive or interpret stimuli as biological, thus optimizing our ability to detect individual differences in neural response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/333880 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online May. 29, 2018; do not think it can account for the current null results, separating imitative tendencies from 548 spatial compatibility would be a useful future direction for research investigating automatic 549 imitation more generally [51, 53,54]. 550…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directions 542mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two further findings of this study are indicative of preserved motor resonance. First, we found a tendency for slower overall responses for the hand than for a moving non‐biological shape, consistent with findings from young participants, and suggesting that motor simulation may have been involved (Gowen et al ., ). Second, imitative compatibility effects for the hand were only observed at the longest stimulus onset asynchrony.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gowen et al . () found that healthy young adults exhibited general stimulus‐response compatibility for the non‐biological shape (faster responses to leftward movements) immediately following stimulus onset and imitative compatibility effects for the finger (faster responses to rightward movements) at an increased delay. The differences in direction and time course of these effects are consistent with the involvement of different mechanisms in imitative priming and general stimulus‐response compatibility (Catmur & Heyes, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%