2020
DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2020.1773762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belonging, Citizenship and Ambivalence among Young Gay, Bisexual and Queer Indian Singaporean Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between components of the sense of country and considering emigration provided the basis for testing the model's validity. Perceived lack of opportunities predicts planning migration from a community (Pretty et al, 2003 ; Arcidiacono et al, 2007 ; Kley and Mulder, 2010 ; Kley, 2017 ; Wenham, 2020 ) and is among the reasons for emigration from a country (Prankumar et al, 2021 ). A lower level of spatiotemporal commitment facilitates the consideration of emigration (Kolesovs, 2021 ), but the sense of personal influence on a country can strengthen prospective belonging to it (Kolesovs, 2019 ).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between components of the sense of country and considering emigration provided the basis for testing the model's validity. Perceived lack of opportunities predicts planning migration from a community (Pretty et al, 2003 ; Arcidiacono et al, 2007 ; Kley and Mulder, 2010 ; Kley, 2017 ; Wenham, 2020 ) and is among the reasons for emigration from a country (Prankumar et al, 2021 ). A lower level of spatiotemporal commitment facilitates the consideration of emigration (Kolesovs, 2021 ), but the sense of personal influence on a country can strengthen prospective belonging to it (Kolesovs, 2019 ).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To become a first-world cosmopolitan nation, Singapore embraced the principles and values of communitarianism, materialism, meritocracy and pragmatism (Ortmann, 2009;Oswin, 2012;Tan, 2012). These, in turn, led to the promotion of a national identity, the need for racial and religious harmony, the prerogative of the heterosexual family as the basic unit of the Singapore society as well as the importance of putting the needs of the nation and society above individual needs (Prankumar et al, 2021). Therefore, economic and social policies were implemented to privilege these goals and prevented LGBTQ individuals and samesex couples from receiving social and legal recognition and forming their own families through adoption or surrogacy (Chang, 2003;Tan & Lee, 2007).…”
Section: Situation In Singaporementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning in the latter part of the twentieth century, scholars from diverse fields started making connections between such markers as sexual identity, gender, and race and national belonging (Heng & Devan 1995;Offord 1999), critiquing government policies as well as linking them to issues of human rights. More recent work has been more specific and finely focused on divorced and lesbian mothers (Tang & Quah 2018), transnational lesbian identities (Tang 2012), and queer Indian-Singaporean men (Phillips 2012;Prankumar, Aggleton & Bryant 2020). Still others have provided insights into postcolonial LGBT identities (Tang 2016;Oswin 2010).…”
Section: Sexuality and Language In Singaporementioning
confidence: 99%