2002
DOI: 10.2307/1567305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belonging: Towards a Theory of Identification with Place

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Performativity as a replication and repetition of certain performances, which are associated with ritualistic practices with which communities colonize various territories. These performances are in fact the realization of the right to use in certain spaces and through them a certain attachment and belonging to place is developed (Leach, 2002).…”
Section: Everyday Belonging and Gendered Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performativity as a replication and repetition of certain performances, which are associated with ritualistic practices with which communities colonize various territories. These performances are in fact the realization of the right to use in certain spaces and through them a certain attachment and belonging to place is developed (Leach, 2002).…”
Section: Everyday Belonging and Gendered Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History made present through inalienable objects and places bestows knowledge o f who one is on these people, who can connect with past selves recognised in familiar places (Leach, 2002). This is always a negotiable and possibly exclusionary process (Blokland, 2001;Jones, 2010, page 199); what counts as an inalienable relationship may not be straightforward.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is always a negotiable and possibly exclusionary process (Blokland, 2001;Jones, 2010, page 199); what counts as an inalienable relationship may not be straightforward. Inalienable relationships are formed through repetitive activity over time (Gray, 1999;Leach, 2002), so that belonging as a way o f being-in-the-world is part o f the mundane nature o f everyday life. The presence o f the past in daily life is often overlooked, sometimes made visible only through certain reminders-in this case, talking about the photographs taken as part o f this research process (Kuhn, 2000, page 183).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space (the subjective livelihood of people) and place (the environmental surroundings) have a qualitatively distinguishable conceptual meaning. 22 Space can be a subjective construct that goes beyond its personalization, 22 but the meaning and usage of space can have a profound implication for disability and poverty indicators. It is within this thought and conceptualization that the social model of disability is to be re-evaluated.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%