2022
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-11381-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Below-cloud scavenging of aerosol by rain: a review of numerical modelling approaches and sensitivity simulations with mineral dust in the Met Office's Unified Model

Abstract: Abstract. Theoretical models of the below-cloud scavenging (BCS) of aerosol by rain yield scavenging rates that are 1–2 orders of magnitude smaller than observations and associated empirical schemes for submicron-sized aerosol. Even when augmented with processes which may explain this disparity, such as phoresis and rear capture in the raindrop wake, the theoretical BCS rates remain an order of magnitude less than observations. Despite this disparity, both theoretical and empirical BCS schemes remain in wide u… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several possible explanations are considered for these observations: this could be due to either an effect of "over-concentration" of falling raindrops or a release of aerosols due to their evaporation (Huff and Stout, 1964;Baechmann et al, 1996a, b;Gong et al, 2011); alternatively, it could be due to an increase in scavenging efficiency due to the reduction of droplet size distribution, implying a larger effective surface of capture (e.g. Jones et al, 2022) as well as to a local emission phenomenon (Karşı et al, 2018).…”
Section: Intra-event Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several possible explanations are considered for these observations: this could be due to either an effect of "over-concentration" of falling raindrops or a release of aerosols due to their evaporation (Huff and Stout, 1964;Baechmann et al, 1996a, b;Gong et al, 2011); alternatively, it could be due to an increase in scavenging efficiency due to the reduction of droplet size distribution, implying a larger effective surface of capture (e.g. Jones et al, 2022) as well as to a local emission phenomenon (Karşı et al, 2018).…”
Section: Intra-event Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical wet scavenging models can take these processes into account but are known to underestimate the scavenging rate by 1-2 orders of magnitude for accumulation-mode particles (Wang et al, 2010(Wang et al, , 2011. This offset can be reduced by taking into account other so-called phoretic effects (thermophoresis, diffusiophoresis and electric effects; Sportisse, 2007;Jones et al, 2022) and the rear capture effect (Jones et al, 2022). Most ATMs, however, use empirical models for scavenging, which ignore these more complex microphysical processes and instead use fits of measured scavenging rates to certain empirical functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%