2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belowground ectomycorrhizal fungal communities respond to liming in three southern Swedish coniferous forest stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Actinobacteria can also contribute to tree vitality by antifungal activity against some soil-borne pathogens (Kamara, Gangwa 2015). The differences in fungal species abundance between both types of fertilized sites and control are consistent with previous studies that showed species-specific changes in the ECM fungal community composition after forest liming (Jonsson et al 1999;Kjøller, Clemmensen 2009). Our data indicated a strong effect of wood ash application on the ECM species abundance, which is in accordance with previous studies (Klavina et al 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The Actinobacteria can also contribute to tree vitality by antifungal activity against some soil-borne pathogens (Kamara, Gangwa 2015). The differences in fungal species abundance between both types of fertilized sites and control are consistent with previous studies that showed species-specific changes in the ECM fungal community composition after forest liming (Jonsson et al 1999;Kjøller, Clemmensen 2009). Our data indicated a strong effect of wood ash application on the ECM species abundance, which is in accordance with previous studies (Klavina et al 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Wood ash is a common liming material as it increases forest soil capacity to neutralize acids (Kjøller and Clemmensen 2009). Similar to effect of liming, wood ash application leads to changes in tree root distribution (Majdi and Viebke 2004) and increase of fine root biomass (Nowotny et al 1998;Jonsson et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest adverse ecological effect of wood ash fertilization has been reported for acidophilic ecosystems, particularly on bryophyte, soil bacteria and ECM fungal communities (Pitman 2006;Augusto et al 2008). In general, differences in ECM fungal community composition have been observed after lime application (Andersson and Söderström 1995;Erland and Taylor 2002;Kjøller and Clemmensen 2009). ECM fungal mycelium was shown to grow slower in limed peat substrate with increased pH than in unlimed peat (Erland et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we have discovered many of the important factors that govern community structure from studies of specific communities. For example, we now know that the structure of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities is affected by various ecological factors and management practices including soil type (Gehring et al 1998), fire (Grogan et al 2000;Chen and Cairney 2002;Anderson et al 2007), herbivory (Gehring and Bennett 2009), canopy gap formation (Grebenc et al 2009), soil fertility (Kranabetter et al 2009), liming (Kjøller and Clemmensen 2009;Rineau et al 2010), heavy metal pollution (Markkola et al 2002), land use history (Diedhiou et al 2010) and urbanization (Baxter et al 1999). It stands to reason that the structure of a community is altered by such factors and practices because the component species respond in different ways to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%