Bench Comparative Assessment of Mechanically Assisted Cough Devices

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanically assisted cough devices are used in patients with impaired cough to avoid secretion accumulation. We compared 5 mechanically assisted cough devices by bench testing using a breathing simulator and assessed their user-friendliness. METHODS: We measured inspiratory and expiratory airway pressures and peak expiratory flow, the strongest indicator of cough efficacy. We performed 2 bench tests: 1) to ascertain the differences between preset and actual settings in 3 different machines of each mechanically assisted cough device and 2) to assess the effects of varying respiratory impedance and air leaks on performance of the devices. We also evaluated the user-friendliness of the devices by measuring the time required and errors in accomplishing 4 tasks by 10 physicians unfamiliar with mechanically assisted cough devices compared with product specialists from the distributing companies. Physicians also scored the ease of use. RESULTS: Four mechanically assisted cough devices during insufflation and all 5 during exsufflation showed differences between preset and actual airway pressures. All but one device showed uneven actual pressure values between models of the same type. Peak expiratory flow was significantly influenced by the mechanical properties in 2 devices and by air leaks in 4 devices. The median time to accomplish all tasks by the product specialist (10 [interquartile range of 2-29] s) was overall significantly shorter compared with all physicians (from 19 [14 -65] to 36 [19 -116] s). The number of procedural errors, but not the perceived ease of use, differed significantly between the devices. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of different mechanically assisted cough devices was erratic and included variance between models from the same manufacturer; it was affected by respiratory system impedance and air leaks. Time and rate of errors for performing procedures were elevated. These findings indicate that the devices are not interchangeable and that the settings should be targeted for each patient with the specific machine being used. Improvements in reliability, performance, and user-friendliness are advisable.

Chest physiotherapy improves lung aeration in hypersecretive critically ill patients: a pilot randomized physiological study

“…In the last years, mechanical assisted cough devices have been increasingly used in the acute setting; however, these devices aim to remove secretions from the large airways to the airway opening, through a sequential application of positive and negative (sub-atmospheric) pressure to the airway [37]. Differently, HFCWO aims to mobilize secretions from the smallest and deepest airways towards the upper and larger airways.…”

Respiratory Implications of Pediatric Neuromuscular Disease

“…A bench study that compared 5 devices for their accuracy in delivering set pressures and set times to a lung model disclosed discrepancies in most MI-E models tested. 46 The investigators also found inconsistencies in the pressures delivered and their duration between different devices of the same model of in-exsufflator. Furthermore, the performance of each of the models was affected differently by alterations in lung mechanics and imposed leaks.…”

Effect of High-Frequency Oscillations on Cough Peak Flows Generated by Mechanical In-Exsufflation in Medically Stable Subjects With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

“…Thus, in the presence of air leaks, the set pressure is reached later, making the delay in the commencement of the oscillations greater. A recent study by Frigerio et al 28 found that the presence of air leaks can affect the performance of conventional MI-E. Another feature seen in the flow wave analysis and described previously 18 is that at the beginning of the pause after the end of exsufflation cycle, a drop in the flow wave occurs due to the elastic recoil of the lung.…”