2021
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark calculations of proton affinity and gas‐phase basicity using multilevel (G4 and G3B3), B3LYP and MP2 computational methods of para‐substituted benzaldehyde compounds

Abstract: This study presents the benchmark calculations of proton affinities (PAs) and gas-phase basicities (GBs) of 8-para substituted benzaldehyde compounds using the multilevel model chemistries (G3B3 and G4), density-functional quantum model (B3LYP) and ab initio model (MP2). The results show that the computed properties are strongly correlated with the available experimental data. The PAs and the GBs of other eight para-substituted benzaldehyde compounds, for which the experimental data does not currently exist, h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the selection of this moderate level of theory can be rationalized based on the successful of the B3LYP in many applications including geometric structures. 9,21,[80][81][82][83][84] The 12 AIP values (with corrected ZPE) of the hydantoin derivatives are reported in Table S4. In order to check the validity and accuracy of the examined 16 DFT methods, the statistical analysis using some important statistical descriptors, including mean unsigned deviation (MD), mean average deviation (MAD), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and determination coefficient (R 2 ) with respect to the standard reference values (Table S5), was carried out, and the results are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dft Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the selection of this moderate level of theory can be rationalized based on the successful of the B3LYP in many applications including geometric structures. 9,21,[80][81][82][83][84] The 12 AIP values (with corrected ZPE) of the hydantoin derivatives are reported in Table S4. In order to check the validity and accuracy of the examined 16 DFT methods, the statistical analysis using some important statistical descriptors, including mean unsigned deviation (MD), mean average deviation (MAD), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and determination coefficient (R 2 ) with respect to the standard reference values (Table S5), was carried out, and the results are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dft Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the fundamental gaps' results of the different hydantoin derivatives (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) shows that the values of this parameter vary from 9.43 to 10.93 eV. The data in Table 3 indicate that substitution of EDGs (Me, NH 2 , and OH) decreases the energy gap of the substituted hydantoin derivatives and consequently increases the chemical reactivity.…”
Section: Inspection Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…34,35 Several studies were recently carried out in an attempt to predict PA of organic molecules using ab initio or DFT computational approaches. [36][37][38] Additionally, PA was calculated for indole 39 as a benchmark using ab initio MP2 (Moller-Plesset with second-order energy correction) and DFT with two functionals B3LYP and M06-2X and five different basis sets to compare their agreement with available experimental values revealing that B3LYP is optimal in terms of computational cost and accuracy, even with a relatively restricted basis set 6-31+G(d,p). PA and IE were then calculated for several classes of molecules using this level of theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%