2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.102.014302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark neutrinoless double- β decay matrix elements in a light nucleus

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. [24] the NCSM calculations of 6 He M 0ν were benchmarked against the results from the multireference in-medium similarity renormalization group (MR-IMSRG) with a softened chiral interaction. Moreover, the M 0ν of 6,8,10 He, 14 C and 22 O were calculated with the NCSM and coupled-cluster theory in Ref.…”
Section: Ground State Energy (Mev)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Ref. [24] the NCSM calculations of 6 He M 0ν were benchmarked against the results from the multireference in-medium similarity renormalization group (MR-IMSRG) with a softened chiral interaction. Moreover, the M 0ν of 6,8,10 He, 14 C and 22 O were calculated with the NCSM and coupled-cluster theory in Ref.…”
Section: Ground State Energy (Mev)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both of these systems we use the NNLO opt interaction, which was not renormalized, as compared to the SRG evolved N3LO-EM interaction used in Refs. [9,24,25]. In the case of the A = 6 system, the calculations are done up to N max =8 model space with Ω =20 MeV.…”
Section: Ground State Energy (Mev)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A way to avoid the model dependence and thus the uncertainties that are caused by model assumptions and approximation made in different models is to calculate the NMEs from first principles, which is currently the goal of several theoretical groups. However, applying modern ab initio methods to 0νββ decay is challenging and the 0νββ candidate nuclei are generally more complicated and heavier than those treated so far (Hergert et al, 2016;Pastore et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2019;Basili et al, 2020). Thus, traditional nuclear model calculations for 0νββ NMEs are still very much needed for the interpretation of the experimental results as well as for the planning of the future experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the long-range nature of the process, recent nuclear effective field theory (EFT) analyses of the elementary subprocess nn → pp (ee) have revealed a shortdistance contribution to the amplitude at leading order (LO), with a low-energy constant (LEC) of the corresponding isotensor contact operator that absorbs the ultraviolet (UV) scale dependence of the amplitude through Renormalization Group (RG) [9,10]. As such a subprocess cannot be observed in free space, and given the program that has been formed around the use of nuclear EFTs to systematically improve the ab initio nuclear structure calculations of the nuclear matrix elements [11][12][13][14][15] toward experimentally-relevant isotopes, the missing knowledge of the value of such a shortdistance contribution appears to impede progress, and has promoted indirect but less certain estimations [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%