2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-020-02660-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark studies on protonated benzene (BZH+) and water (Wn, n = 1–6) clusters: a comparison of hybrid DFT with MP2/CBS and CCSD(T)/CBS methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] Also, PBE0-D3/6-311 + + G** BEs of Bz-H + W n (n = 1 -3) are closer to those determined using CCSD(T)/CBS. [19] Hereafter, we will refer to the PBE0-D3/6-311 + + G** data.…”
Section: Binding Energies Of Bz-h + W N Cor-h + W N and Dbc-h + W N ...mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[19] Also, PBE0-D3/6-311 + + G** BEs of Bz-H + W n (n = 1 -3) are closer to those determined using CCSD(T)/CBS. [19] Hereafter, we will refer to the PBE0-D3/6-311 + + G** data.…”
Section: Binding Energies Of Bz-h + W N Cor-h + W N and Dbc-h + W N ...mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As discussed in Ref. [19], this level of theory is reliable enough for the investigation of the stable structures, the geometries, the binding energies of Bz-H + W n , Cor-H + W n and Dbc-H + W n (n = 1-3) clusters and to probe their interfacial interactions. Indeed, the benchmarks presented in Ref.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations