2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1707.09092
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking 6DOF Outdoor Visual Localization in Changing Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vision [13] and robotics [14] communities have witnessed the rise of accurate and efficient image-based localization techniques that can be complementary to GPS, which are prone to error due to multi-path effects. The techniques can be classified into regression-based methods and retrievalbased ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The vision [13] and robotics [14] communities have witnessed the rise of accurate and efficient image-based localization techniques that can be complementary to GPS, which are prone to error due to multi-path effects. The techniques can be classified into regression-based methods and retrievalbased ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, retrievalbased ones are usually slower and have a large memory requirement for storing images or its descriptors for the entire city of globe. However, the retrieval-based methods typically provide higher accuracy and robustness [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, dynamic objects like vehicles and pedestrians, modification of the scene, weather conditions or different illumination break this assumption and result in increased number of failure. • Poses predicted by learning are not as accurate as structure-based methods [23]. In addition to larger error, they generate many outliers very far from the actual camera poses, so that trajectories are not consistent over time (in particular for monocular methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, most methods are brittle in certain scenarios, such as varying lighting conditions (e.g. changing time of day), differ- ent weather conditions or seasons [40], repetitive structures, textureless objects, extremely large viewpoint changes, dynamic elements within the environment, and faulty sensor calibration [4]. Because these situations are common in real-world scenarios, robust applications of those systems are difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%