2006
DOI: 10.1108/14678040610679461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking and library quality maturity

Abstract: Purpose - It remains unresolved from the literature whether benchmarking is a useful and appropriate tool for the library and information services sector. The aim of this research was to gather evidence to establish whether benchmarking provides a real and lasting benefit to library and information services.\ud Design/methodology/approach - The study investigated the long term effects of a benchmarking exercise on the quality level of three UK academic libraries. However, an appropriate framework for assessing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• an information literacy model, the Seven Pillars, which has been reviewed, updated, and independently judged to have "stood the test of time" and "attracted widespread recognition within the academic library community in the UK and internationally" (Goldstein, 2015, p. 8;SCONUL, 2011); • a library benchmarking methodology, based on industry best practices adapted and field-tested in the library sector, and captured in the SCONUL Benchmarking Manual (Town, 2000d); • a values-based scorecard framework for assessing and measuring library value, which offers a broader, higher-level view of library resources, services, and facilities; addresses longstanding weaknesses in library measurement practice; and incorporates tools with potential for stand-alone usage, notably the Seven Markets Model supporting the key area of relationship management Town, 2015b;Town 2015d); • a quality maturity/capability tool, developed to support benchmarking activities, but with potential for application in other contexts, including meta-level measurement as part of the scorecard framework (Wilson and Town, 2006;Town, 2014b). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• an information literacy model, the Seven Pillars, which has been reviewed, updated, and independently judged to have "stood the test of time" and "attracted widespread recognition within the academic library community in the UK and internationally" (Goldstein, 2015, p. 8;SCONUL, 2011); • a library benchmarking methodology, based on industry best practices adapted and field-tested in the library sector, and captured in the SCONUL Benchmarking Manual (Town, 2000d); • a values-based scorecard framework for assessing and measuring library value, which offers a broader, higher-level view of library resources, services, and facilities; addresses longstanding weaknesses in library measurement practice; and incorporates tools with potential for stand-alone usage, notably the Seven Markets Model supporting the key area of relationship management Town, 2015b;Town 2015d); • a quality maturity/capability tool, developed to support benchmarking activities, but with potential for application in other contexts, including meta-level measurement as part of the scorecard framework (Wilson and Town, 2006;Town, 2014b). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here Town suggests combining affect data with productivity or creativity data, and exploring potential links between ClimateQUAL+ and LibQUAL+ data. For Culture of Momentum, he proposes assessing the volume and speed of improvement projects in relation to competitors, but linking such measures to evidence of enhanced library or institutional reputation to demonstrate competitive impact; he also notes the library's quality capability as critical here, suggesting possible application of the Quality Maturity Model from his benchmarking work with Wilson as a "meta-level measurement" (Town et al, 2013, p. 57;Town, 2014b, p. 77;Town and Wilson, 2006;.…”
Section: Human Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wilson & Town, 2006;Wijetunge, 2012;Town, 2014;Wilson, 2012Wilson, , 2015 have been conducted to assess the quality maturity levels of university libraries in specific Wilson (2015) as a framework for self-assessment and has encouraged its use by libraries that are seeking to assess their progress towards achieving a quality culture.…”
Section: Maturity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality management models and their forms of development and implementation in organizations (Cullen, 2005;Oakland, 2003;Wilson & Town, 2006). 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%