Proceedings of 16th IEEE/CPMT International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/iemt.1994.404741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking and QFD: accelerating the successful implementation of no clean soldering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those correlations are used as the input parameters for the product design optimization by using mathematical programming. For accelerating successful implementation, a combination of benchmarking and the QFD method was suggested by Gutierrez and Tulkoff in 1994 [11], with the Austin's Electronic Card Assembly and Test (ECAT) manufacturing process applied as the case study. Customer satisfaction was obtained when the time taken to make similar changes was reduced.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those correlations are used as the input parameters for the product design optimization by using mathematical programming. For accelerating successful implementation, a combination of benchmarking and the QFD method was suggested by Gutierrez and Tulkoff in 1994 [11], with the Austin's Electronic Card Assembly and Test (ECAT) manufacturing process applied as the case study. Customer satisfaction was obtained when the time taken to make similar changes was reduced.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this method is essential, especially in terms of product design and innovation. The concept of QFD is very effective at giving the appropriate engineering elements at each stage of engineering design, production process, and development and prototype evaluation [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Butler's treatment, there were no explicit cost factors for PWAs related to environmental costs. Guitierrez and Tulkoff (1994) report savings for PWA product and process design changes that include waste reduction, labor reduction, utilities reduction, and material cost reduction. In other financial models, life-cycle costing for both production and disassembly of electronics has been developed (Brouwers and Stevels 1995;Cramer and Stevels 1995;Willeins and Stevels 1995).…”
Section: Lca Dfe Environmental Management and Production Planning mentioning
confidence: 99%