El acceso a la versión del editor puede requerir la suscripción del recurso Access to the published version may require subscription technology is expected to become mature in the medium term, and it may be used as an alternative to current OCS networks, due to its potential advantages in terms of bandwidth allocation granularity. While OBS is being extensively studied in the literature, little attention has been paid to comparative analysis of OBS versus OCS, specially concerning cost analysis. In this paper, we provide a comparative analysis of OBS versus OCS as an evolutionary technology for all-optical rings in the metropolitan access network. This study is specifically targeted towards optimizing the number of optoelectronic (O/E) receivers and wavelengths, with real traffic matrices from the metropolitan rings in the city of Madrid, Spain. Such matrices also include traffic projections of foreseeable broadband services, based on a market analysis from the largest operator in Spain. Our findings show that OCS might be more efficient than OBS in the metro access segment, which is characterized by a highly centralized traffic pattern. However, the more distributed the traffic is the more efficient OBS is. Consequently, OBS might be better suited to metro-core networks, which show a more distributed and dynamic traffic pattern.