2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking ENDF/B-VII.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar approach has also been used in other ENDF/B-VII evaluations for important actinides, such as 235,238 U and 239 Pu [19]. Subsequent validation proved that the thus obtained improvements of inelastic scattering data largely improved library performance in integral benchmarking [20]. Our "deformed" MSD approach allows to achieve similar result on a physically sound basis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Similar approach has also been used in other ENDF/B-VII evaluations for important actinides, such as 235,238 U and 239 Pu [19]. Subsequent validation proved that the thus obtained improvements of inelastic scattering data largely improved library performance in integral benchmarking [20]. Our "deformed" MSD approach allows to achieve similar result on a physically sound basis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These benchmarks were already extensively studied for the validation of the ENDF/B-VII.0 library in Ref. [10]. For each of the selected benchmarks, the impact of the nuclear data uncertainty for a single isotope is studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic discrepancies are observed in criticality safety benchmarks containing tungsten [2], fusion neutronics benchmarks [3], and measured constants for neutron activation [4]. These discrepancies motivated the work presented herein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%