2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Five Global Optimization Approaches for Nano-optical Shape Optimization and Parameter Reconstruction

Abstract: Numerical optimization is an important tool in the field of computational physics in general and in nano-optics in specific. It has attracted attention with the increase in complexity of structures that can be realized with nowadays nano-fabrication technologies for which a rational design is no longer feasible. Also, numerical resources are available to enable the computational photonic material design and to identify structures that meet predefined optical properties for specific applications. However, the o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 35 ] The system parameters with optimal fiber‐coupling efficiency were determined using Bayesian optimization as global optimization method. [ 36 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 35 ] The system parameters with optimal fiber‐coupling efficiency were determined using Bayesian optimization as global optimization method. [ 36 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it makes little sense to optimize a part of the structure almost independently of the rest, the advantage of DE will not play out. Recent results 41 show that for some problems in photonics with a low number of dimensions, DE is in fact among the worst possible choices. We insist that DE is more relevant for modular design problems, which implies a relatively large number of parameters (more than 5 typically).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, parametrizations should have large degrees of freedom in order to not unnecessarily restrict the design space. Note that for low-dimensional parametrizations, Bayesian optimization and even brute force parameter sweeps may be a better choice than inverse design [22].…”
Section: A1 Parametrization Selection Matrix and Permittivity Distmentioning
confidence: 99%