Benchmarking higher education programs through alignment analysis based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a scalable quantitative approach to evaluate alignment within and between courses and programs in higher education for benchmarking purpose. Design/methodology/approach The revised Bloom’s taxonomy, which combines a cognitive process dimension and a knowledge dimension, is used as a basis for categorizing national standards, program and course learning outcomes (CLOs) and assessment methods. Alignments between programs and national standards, programs and courses and assessment tasks and courses are then measured using a series of Cohen’s κ statistics. Two undergraduate business programs offered at an Australian university were used as examples to demonstrate the proposed method as an alignment evaluation tool. Findings The findings reveal that the two sample programs are better aligned with national standards than with their respective constituent courses. The degree of alignment between CLOs and assessment methods varies from course to course within the programs. This might be related to the lack of clarity of some learning outcome statements and the complexity of certain assessment methods. Research limitations/implications This study lends insight into the use of an alignment mapping for benchmarking academic programs in higher education. To serve mainly as an illustration of the proposed approach, the case study is limited to two undergraduate business programs offered at the same university. Practical implications Universities can use the proposed approach to benchmark their academic programs against the national standards and similar programs offered by other competing educational institutions. The alignment indices can also serve as yardsticks to continuously improve the consistencies within and among academic programs to ensure quality. Originality/value The proposed method offers a consistent basis to compare the degrees of alignment of different higher education programs with national standards and their respective constituent courses, hence enabling benchmarking for continuous improvement. It also reveals how the alignment between different parameters in teaching and learning can be improved, thereby facilitating incremental learning and enhancing student performance.

Enhancing student engagement through heterogeneous pedagogical approaches: action research in a university level course in Saudi Arabia

“…Yet student engagement is fundamentally different from and extends beyond the concept of “academic task accomplishment” (Bergmann and Sams, 2014). Fundamentally, student engagement is defined as a psychological investment and cognitive involvement in understanding, learning, and mastering knowledge, skills and crafts (Zepke and Leach, 2010; Lau et al , 2018). It is more than just completing the assigned tasks or qualifying for commonly accepted measures of success (e.g., grades).…”

“…Student engagement is considered a robust measure of student learning (Bergmann and Sams, 2014). Students learn more and master relevant skills when they are engaged in the learning process and acquire feedback on their academic activities such as writing, analyzing and problem-solving (Kuh, 2003; Lau et al , 2018). Engaged students develop exploration and learning habits that strengthen their capacity for personal and professional development (Shulman, 2002).…”

Improving assessment accountability in initial teacher education programs through benchmarking

“…The findings from the checklists and the collation of the year level team information clearly demonstrated that integration of learning across the programs took place when learning outcomes and content were clearly aligned. The alignment of learning outcomes, curriculum and assessment are necessary to guide instruction and student teacher learning (Lau et al, 2018). This study noted that it was particularly evident when learning outcomes were strongly linked to professional workplace experience.…”

Robust Estimation of Student Performance in Massive Open Online Course using Fuzzy Logic Approach

“…Therefore, various methods of teaching and learning were introduced in order to achieve the objective of teaching and learning. Course Learning Outcome (CLO) is the benchmark of course output [2] that describe what students will know and be able to do upon successful complete a program or course.…”