2008
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under ITER conditions

Abstract: Abstract. Optimal design and use of electron cyclotron heating (ECH) requires that accurate and relatively quick computer codes be available for prediction of wave coupling, propagation, damping, and current drive at realistic levels of EC power. To this end, a number of codes have been developed in laboratories worldwide. A detailed comparison of these codes is desirable since they use a variety of methods for modeling 2 the behavior and effects of the waves. The approach used in this benchmarking study is to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
162
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
162
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main features of the five codes for ECH&CD computation currently ported to the ITM framework, are listed in Table 1. Three of these codes, namely GRAY [4], TORAY-FOM [5], and TORBEAM [6] had already been benchmarked in 2008 against other EC codes [7]. Since that benchmark, all the codes have been subject to changes to improve the description of various physics' aspects, e.g.…”
Section: Ec Codes Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main features of the five codes for ECH&CD computation currently ported to the ITM framework, are listed in Table 1. Three of these codes, namely GRAY [4], TORAY-FOM [5], and TORBEAM [6] had already been benchmarked in 2008 against other EC codes [7]. Since that benchmark, all the codes have been subject to changes to improve the description of various physics' aspects, e.g.…”
Section: Ec Codes Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasma parameters and geometry used for this benchmarking study are those of a standard ITER scenario, known as "Scenario 2", used also for the benchmark in [7]. It is an H-mode scenario, with nominal vacuum toroidal field B 0 = 5.3 T at major radius R 0 = 6.2 m, plasma current I p = 15 MA, central electron density n e,0 = 1.02 × 10 20 m −3 , central electron temperature T e,0 = 25 keV, and an effective ionic charge Z eff ∼ 1.7 roughly uniform throughout the plasma.…”
Section: Iter As Benchmarking Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC deposition has been treated by 1D ray tracing and more complex full-wave calculations [3] and benchmarked against experimental deposition measurements [4]. Still, unresolved questions with significance for ITER remain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is pointed out that conserving momentum in electron-electron collisions may have the effect for the current [4], it is necessary to modify the operator to conserve momentum. The Ray tracing code shows a large impact of parallel momentum conservation for ECCD simulation [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%