2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-021-2017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking of two three-dimensional numerical models in time/space domain to predict railway-induced ground vibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…W mn F mn (11) In order to obtain the analytical expression of the time function T mn (t), the flow excitation q(x, y, t) is rewritten as follows:…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of the Sbp-foundation Coupled Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…W mn F mn (11) In order to obtain the analytical expression of the time function T mn (t), the flow excitation q(x, y, t) is rewritten as follows:…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of the Sbp-foundation Coupled Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the mechanism of ground vibrations, there are several studies on ground vibration induced by excitations such as seismic effect [10], railway [11], pile driving [12], etc., but research into the mechanism of ground vibration induced by flood discharge is still in the initial stage. Based on the results of prototype monitoring, researchers [7] have summarized that this type of ground vibration is a continuous stationary random dynamic response characterized by low frequency, small amplitude, shock characteristics, and longdistance propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and as can be seen it corresponds to a symmetric case, so that only half of it has been modeled. The dimensions of the model are 70x40x30 m in the longitudinal, horizontal and vertical directions respectively, which are values considered and experimentally validated in 3D models of finite elements formulated in the time domain similar to those used here [16,[18][19][20][21]. The railpad is modeled as a linear spring, whereas the rail has been simulated as a beam, with the normalized properties of the UIC-60 type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%