2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b05143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Semiempirical Methods To Compute Electrochemical Formal Potentials

Abstract: Computational methods to predict and tune electrochemical redox potentials are important for the development of energy technologies. Here, we benchmark several semiempirical models to compute reduction potentials of organic molecules, comparing approaches based on (1) energy differences between the S and one-electron-reduced D states of the isolated molecules and (2) an orbital energy shift approach based on tuning the charge-transfer triplet energy of the Ag-molecule complex; the second model enables explicit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of molecules was originally compiled by Marenich et al [26], and we have used the same set for convenience and consistency. Furthermore, this is a suitable set because redox potential data in aqueous solution studies is much more sparse than typical benchmarking data sets [3,28,[49][50][51][52][53]. The experimental potentials of the set of 53 molecules range from -0.24 to 1.47 V vs the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The set of molecules was originally compiled by Marenich et al [26], and we have used the same set for convenience and consistency. Furthermore, this is a suitable set because redox potential data in aqueous solution studies is much more sparse than typical benchmarking data sets [3,28,[49][50][51][52][53]. The experimental potentials of the set of 53 molecules range from -0.24 to 1.47 V vs the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the redox potential of organic molecules in solutions is crucial for the rational design of such technologies. Various methodologies are currently employed to calculate redox potential in solutions: i) the Born-Haber thermodynamic cycle (BHTC) [24][25][26][27], ii) the S0-D0 energy difference approximation (EDA) [28][29][30], and iii) the molecular orbital energy approximation (MOEA) [28,31,32]. In the BHTC method, the redox potential is calculated from the standard free energy of product and reactants in a redox half-reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of parameters fit to experimental and high-level computational results has enabled high enough accuracy to provide understanding of chemical properties including thermochemistry, 13,21,22 noncovalent interactions, 13,21,23 excited states, 24,25 pKa, 14,19 magnetism, 26 solvatochromism, 27 and electrochemical formal potentials. 28 We note that the Density Functional Tight Binding (DFTB) model is a semiempirical-like model based on a Hamiltonian simplified from Density Functional Theory (DFT) and has many capabilities similar to those of Hartree-Fock-based SEQMs; [29][30][31] here, we focus exclusively on SEQMs derived from Hartree-Fock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the redox potential of organic molecules in solutions is crucial for the rational design of such technologies. Various methodologies are currently employed to calculate redox potential in solutions: i) the Born-Haber thermodynamic cycle (BHTC) [24][25][26][27], ii) the S0-D0 energy difference approximation (EDA) [28][29][30], and iii) the molecular orbital energy approximation (MOEA) [28,31,32]. In the BHTC method, the redox potential is calculated from the standard free energy of product and reactants in a redox half-reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%