2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0469-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
328
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(379 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
15
328
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of single-cell omics datasets is increasing. Current datasets often include many samples 1 , generated across multiple conditions 2 , with the involvement of multiple labs 3 . Such complexity, which is common in maps of specific tissues and organs or whole reference atlas initiatives such as the Human Cell Atlas 4 , creates inevitable batch effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of single-cell omics datasets is increasing. Current datasets often include many samples 1 , generated across multiple conditions 2 , with the involvement of multiple labs 3 . Such complexity, which is common in maps of specific tissues and organs or whole reference atlas initiatives such as the Human Cell Atlas 4 , creates inevitable batch effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent benchmarking studies by Ding et al and Mereu et al . [11, 12] have systematically and comprehensively compared existing single-cell sequencing techniques, providing invaluable resource for users to make informed choices. To compare the technical performance between C4 and these single-cell platforms, we firstly analyzed the data from HEK293T/NIH3T3 mixture cells in replicates and the data generated from the same cell types in the study by Ding et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike sc-based methods, sn approaches are compatible with snapfrozen tissue samples and minimize ex vivo expression changes 14 . The transcriptome complexity identified by snRNAseq is comparable to that of scRNAseq methods 15 . Besides its reliability for profiling the transcriptome at sc resolution 10, 12,16,17,18 , sn isolation also allows mapping of the chromatin-regulatory landscape 19, 20, 21 and genome-wide measurement of DNA methylation 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%