The Engineering of Sport 6 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-45951-6_74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Stiffness of Current Sprint Spikes and Concept Selective Laser Sintered Nylon Outsoles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for the behaviour of the athlete's sprinting spikes and the passive structures surrounding the MTP DOFs we included a simple linear rotational spring. The stiffness of the rotational spring was set to 65 Nm/rad by combining the rotational stiffness of sprinting spikes/ sports shoes (Oh & Park, 2017;Toon et al, 2006) with the rotational stiffness used previously for representing the passive structures surrounding the MTP DOFs (Sasaki, Neptune & Kautz, 2009). Polynomials were used to describe the lengths, velocities and moment arms of the MTUs as functions of the model's generalised coordinates and velocities (Falisse et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for the behaviour of the athlete's sprinting spikes and the passive structures surrounding the MTP DOFs we included a simple linear rotational spring. The stiffness of the rotational spring was set to 65 Nm/rad by combining the rotational stiffness of sprinting spikes/ sports shoes (Oh & Park, 2017;Toon et al, 2006) with the rotational stiffness used previously for representing the passive structures surrounding the MTP DOFs (Sasaki, Neptune & Kautz, 2009). Polynomials were used to describe the lengths, velocities and moment arms of the MTUs as functions of the model's generalised coordinates and velocities (Falisse et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study did not account for the potential influence of the individual athlete's footwear. Toon et al [6] determined that considerable disparity in longitudinal bending stiffness, approximately 20 per cent, exists between sprint spikes targeted at elite athletes. Because of factors such as athlete preference and mechanical fatigue, however, the actual levels of elite sprint spike longitudinal bending stiffness can vary over a considerably larger range.…”
Section: They Would Experience Smaller Peak Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shod condition involved athletes wearing an Adidas Demolisher 2005 sprint spike. This shoe was selected because it had the highest bending stiffness coefficient (0.40 N m/deg À1 ) of a selection of 11 currently available sprint spikes [6].…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%