2020
DOI: 10.1002/mats.202000065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Stochastic and Deterministic Kinetic Modeling of Bulk and Solution Radical Polymerization Processes by Including Six Types of Factors Two

Abstract: Bulk and solution radical polymerization is important in daily live. A challenge is still to maximize polymerization rate and control over molecular characteristics such as the molar mass distribution. The last decades have made clear that kinetic modeling is indispensable with originally most focus on deterministic implementations such as the method of moments (MoM) and only more recently promising results for event‐driven kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) simulations that belong to stochastic methods. Computationall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of species whose three-dimensional (3D) positions are thus not explicitly tracked are provided in Figure c, differentiating between monomer molecules ( M ), RDRP initiator molecules ( R 0 X ), dormant chains ( R i X ), and dead chains ( Pi ) with i and j chain lengths. MFA is consistent with bulk/solution modeling studies on FRP, RDRP, and living polymerization, in which one follows the variation of the concentrations as a function of synthesis time assuming perfect macroscale mixing and temperature control.…”
Section: Modeling Principles and Developmentsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of species whose three-dimensional (3D) positions are thus not explicitly tracked are provided in Figure c, differentiating between monomer molecules ( M ), RDRP initiator molecules ( R 0 X ), dormant chains ( R i X ), and dead chains ( Pi ) with i and j chain lengths. MFA is consistent with bulk/solution modeling studies on FRP, RDRP, and living polymerization, in which one follows the variation of the concentrations as a function of synthesis time assuming perfect macroscale mixing and temperature control.…”
Section: Modeling Principles and Developmentsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We use the population-weighted method to update the apparent average termination rate coefficient that codefines the global sampling of the termination reaction channel in the solution and corrects for diffusional limitations. Consistent with the work of De Keer et al no additional factor 2 is included to reflect the likelihood that the two radicals involved have a different chain length. For termination with only surface-tethered species, the reaction is only executed if (i) the two chain-ends are next to each other based on the allowed bond length in the region r ∈ [1,√3] and (ii) the chains are not hindered from propagation so that space is available to rearrange the chains.…”
Section: Modeling Principles and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The update interval corresponds to the feed interval. Further, information on the Gillespie algorithm is given by Drache 26 or De Keer et al 49 The addition of molecules is associated with an increase in the control volume, which is calculated at each feeding step from the known densities as a function of temperature of all components. Furthermore, volume contraction during polymerization caused by a higher density of polymer compared to that of monomer is calculated on the basis of the increase in solid content between the last two feeding steps.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An often overlooked consequence of the aforementioned lumping is that the interpretation of “distinguishable” and “nondistinguishable” species becomes more blurry, which has been highlighted in recent work of De Keer et al. [ 126 ] In particular, one needs to remove the extra factor 2 in the Gillespie formula for distinguishable species A and B in case one describes an average (or lumped) termination reactivity. In the overall termination rate, already from a low thus physically realistic i max onwards (e.g., 10), the cross‐contributions reflecting termination with separate chain lengths are dominant over the homo‐contributions reflecting termination with the same chain lengths, explaining the omittance of this factor 2.…”
Section: Kinetic Monte Carlo Principles and Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%