2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking the digital divide using a multi-level outranking framework: Evidence from EBRD countries of operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…relations. Within this area of MCDM we decided on a specific method and software solution, ELECTRE MLO developed in Petrovic et al [69]. The method itself has been shown to be easily applicable for cross-country comparative reporting on various topics [70][71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…relations. Within this area of MCDM we decided on a specific method and software solution, ELECTRE MLO developed in Petrovic et al [69]. The method itself has been shown to be easily applicable for cross-country comparative reporting on various topics [70][71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting article that proposes a procedure to compare the digital divide is the publication of Petrović et al [34]. The authors, in order to implement the comparative analysis process, developed a method of multi-level elevation (ELECTRE MLO) based on the ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choice Translating REality) method family.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the decision on benchmarking partner-units (mostly countries) that will be engaged in the process. As argued by several authors (Rose, 1991, Bauer, 2009, Petrovic et al, 2012, in order to exploit international benchmarking for policy learning and transfer the countries included should share common policy goals and have international organizational/institutional support (such as the EU countries addressed in this study). The other issue is setting a proper indicator set that reflects policy aspects that are to be benchmarked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This path is represented by a set of intermediate benchmarks (performance targets) which mark the improvement steps along the route to the ultimate target (policy agenda goals). One idea to operationalize stepwise benchmarking is to use a multilevel outranking approach based on ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité) as described and applied in public policy domain in Petrovic et al (2012Petrovic et al ( , 2014Petrovic et al ( , 2017 and Stamenkovic et al (2016). In the centre of this approach is the overcoming of certain negative aspects of common analytical tools like DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) or CIs (Composite indices) approach (for comprehensive discussion see Petrovic et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%