2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.12.571251
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking the translational potential of spatial gene expression prediction from histology

Adam S. Chan,
Chuhan Wang,
Xiaohang Fu
et al.

Abstract: Spatial transcriptomics has enabled the quantification of gene expression at spatial coordinates, offering crucial insights into molecular underpinnings of diseases. In light of this, several methods predicting spatial gene expression from paired histology images have offered the opportunity of enhancing the utility of readily obtainable and cost-effective haematoxylin-and-eosin-stained histology images. To this end, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking study encompassing six developed methods. These meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we note that the performance of our method on the top five biologically meaningful genes ( Figure 3c ) had the highest correlation compared to other methods, with GNAS (r = 0.42), FASN (r = 0.42), SCD (r = 0.34), MYL12B (r = 0.32), and CLDN4 (r = 0.32), indicating one should examine correlation among genes with meaningful biological signal. Thus, with the limitation of the PCC values in mind, we examined more meaningful gene characteristics metrics, as discussed in our recent benchmarking work 15 , where we evaluated based on top 10% of HVGs and top 20 SVGs. Figures 3d and 3e, and Supplementary Figure 6 show that our method provided the highest PCC in HVGs (0.20) and SVGs (0.27), and also SSIM in HVGs (0.17) and SVGs (0.26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we note that the performance of our method on the top five biologically meaningful genes ( Figure 3c ) had the highest correlation compared to other methods, with GNAS (r = 0.42), FASN (r = 0.42), SCD (r = 0.34), MYL12B (r = 0.32), and CLDN4 (r = 0.32), indicating one should examine correlation among genes with meaningful biological signal. Thus, with the limitation of the PCC values in mind, we examined more meaningful gene characteristics metrics, as discussed in our recent benchmarking work 15 , where we evaluated based on top 10% of HVGs and top 20 SVGs. Figures 3d and 3e, and Supplementary Figure 6 show that our method provided the highest PCC in HVGs (0.20) and SVGs (0.27), and also SSIM in HVGs (0.17) and SVGs (0.26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe the settings for other spot-based methods below, and more details may be found in our benchmarking work 15 :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations