2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35564-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking tools for detecting longitudinal differential expression in proteomics data allows establishing a robust reproducibility optimization regression approach

Abstract: Quantitative proteomics has matured into an established tool and longitudinal proteomics experiments have begun to emerge. However, no effective, simple-to-use differential expression method for longitudinal proteomics data has been released. Typically, such data is noisy, contains missing values, and has only few time points and biological replicates. To address this need, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of several existing differential expression methods for high-throughput longitudinal omics data and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly relevant when it is necessary to account for biological variability and repeated measures or handle unbalanced designs and missing data (264). The ability to address these challenges makes LLM a powerful tool for proteomics statistical analysis, where it can facilitate the identification of proteins whose abundance change in response to different conditions and various factors (268)(269)(270).…”
Section: Linear Mixed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant when it is necessary to account for biological variability and repeated measures or handle unbalanced designs and missing data (264). The ability to address these challenges makes LLM a powerful tool for proteomics statistical analysis, where it can facilitate the identification of proteins whose abundance change in response to different conditions and various factors (268)(269)(270).…”
Section: Linear Mixed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%