2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(00)00008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarks for scheduling on a single machine against restrictive and unrestrictive common due dates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
109
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The from the upper bounds proposed by Biskup and Feldmann (2001). As revealed in Table 1, on the whole, the proposed RBS algorithm outperformed the nine meta-heuristics.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The from the upper bounds proposed by Biskup and Feldmann (2001). As revealed in Table 1, on the whole, the proposed RBS algorithm outperformed the nine meta-heuristics.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…If a standard set of test problems is accessible, different algorithms' performances can be compared on exactly the same set of test problems. For this reason we chose 280 benchmark problems from Biskup and Feldmann (2001) as the test problems for this study.…”
Section: Test Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…b) The schedule is V-shaped, but a straddling job may exist, i.e., a job whose execution starts before and finished after the due date 25 .…”
Section: Properties For the Restricted Cdd Smetspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the proposed PSO algorithm is examined over the most restricted instances against CDDs of the Biskup and Feldmann (2001)'s benchmarks 25 ; including 140 instances in total ranging from 10 to 1000 jobs. The results obtained are of high quality since new upper bounds have been introduced by PSO in the 82% of the examined benchmarks instances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%