Structural and aeroelastic analyses using beam theories by default choose a cross section that is perpendicular to the reference line. In several cases, such as swept wings with high AR, a beam theory that allows for the choice of a cross section that is oblique to the reference line may be more convenient. This work uses the variational asymptotic method (VAM) to develop such a beam theory. The problems addressed are the planar deformation of a strip and the full 3D deformation of a solid, prismatic, right-circular cylinder, both made of homogeneous, isotropic material. The motivation for choosing these problems is primarily the existence of 3D elasticity solutions, which comprise a complete validation set for all possible deformations and which are shown to be accurately captured by the current analysis. A secondary motivation was that the development and final results of the beam theory, i.e., the cross-sectional stiffness matrix and stressstrain-displacement recovery relations, are obtainable as closed-form analytical expressions. These results, coupled with the VAM-based beam analysis being devoid of ad hoc assumptions, culminate in what is expected to be of significance when formulating a general oblique cross-sectional analysis for beams with anisotropic material and initial curvature/twist, the detailed treatment of which will be alluded to in a later paper.In beam theory, a natural choice of the reference crosssectional plane is the one normal to the reference line. However, using a cross section that is not perpendicular to the beam reference line is of interest in several cases, notable of which are swept wings (see Fig. 1). Relaxing the necessity of a section to be perpendicular to the reference line could also be convenient for users. An oblique cross-sectional analysis is therefore a dimensional reduction that uses a cross section that is not constrained to be perpendicular to the reference line. A review of literature reveals that studies pertaining to this problem are limited. A previous work on oblique cross-sectional analysis [12] was only able to correctly construct the classical model in VABS. Borri et al.[13] mention the possibility of "a cross section which could be tilted with respect to the reference line" and though it may be that Borri and
Journal of Applied Mechanics