2010
DOI: 10.5658/wood.2010.38.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending Creep Performances of Hybrid Laminated Woods Composed of Wood-Wood Based Boards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And these value were slightly lower than that of glulam under constant humidity condition and were considerably lower than that under humidity change. Also, these values were in a similar range as those of wood-based boards such as plywood, particle board and wood-wood based board laminated materials (Nakai, 1878;Arima, 1981;Park et al, 2010). The A values of parallel-and cross-laminated woods proportionally increased with increasing creep compliances.…”
Section: Bending Creep Curves Of Laminated Woodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…And these value were slightly lower than that of glulam under constant humidity condition and were considerably lower than that under humidity change. Also, these values were in a similar range as those of wood-based boards such as plywood, particle board and wood-wood based board laminated materials (Nakai, 1878;Arima, 1981;Park et al, 2010). The A values of parallel-and cross-laminated woods proportionally increased with increasing creep compliances.…”
Section: Bending Creep Curves Of Laminated Woodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, for the cross-laminated wood panels cross-laminating tropical woods and tulip, the N values were almost similar to those of wood-based boards such as plywood and particle board (Nakai, 1978;Arima, 1981) and wood and wood-based board com-posites under constant humidity (Park et al, 2010).…”
Section: Bending Creep Curves Of Laminated Woodsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The bending strength of the cork board was more substantially improved by reinforcing the cork board's middle layer with three types of thin mesh materials, similar to the bending MOE. However, it was found that this value exhibited a very low value of 1.40%-1.50%, compared with that for oyster oak (Byeon et al, 2016), and was lower than 6.71%-7.20% for OSB, 5.07%-5.44% for MDF, and 11.8%-12.7% for PB (Park et al, 2009).…”
Section: Bending Strengthmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…for oriented strand board (OSB), 0.98%-1.07% for medium density fiberboard (MDF), and 1.11%-1.21% for particleboard (PB; Park et al, 2009).…”
Section: Static Bending Modulus Of Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%