2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending effect of through-thickness reinforcement rods on mode I delamination toughness of DCB specimen. I. Linearly elastic and rigid-perfectly plastic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further details on the test procedure can be found in Yasaee et al [14] and M'membe et al [10]. pins normally reported in the literature, the contribution of bending moments can be ignored because they are negated by the growth of cracks along the Z-pin longitudinal axis [5]. However, bending effects cannot be ignored for the metallic Z-pins and must be considered in the DCB analysis [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further details on the test procedure can be found in Yasaee et al [14] and M'membe et al [10]. pins normally reported in the literature, the contribution of bending moments can be ignored because they are negated by the growth of cracks along the Z-pin longitudinal axis [5]. However, bending effects cannot be ignored for the metallic Z-pins and must be considered in the DCB analysis [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pins normally reported in the literature, the contribution of bending moments can be ignored because they are negated by the growth of cracks along the Z-pin longitudinal axis [5]. However, bending effects cannot be ignored for the metallic Z-pins and must be considered in the DCB analysis [5]. Experimental observations have shown that pull out typically occurs from one half of the specimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers consider the bridging effect provided by the through-thickness reinforcements to have a constant bridging length and therefore, total C G can be calculated by averaging the energy dissipation rates over the reinforced area [10,17]. However, this assumption seems more appropriate for SSB than LSB; in the latter case the pin bridging force varies during the fracture process and thus, (2) each pin traction is treated as a concentrated force acting at the pin location and governed by a non-linear force-displacement relation [7,11,17,26]. When the first approach is employed, the bridging relation is defined as either a stressdisplacement relation [9,10] or the stiffness of an elastic foundation [12].…”
Section: Energy Balance During Crack Bridgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of models have been developed for predicting delamination suppression in zpinned laminates. These models are either analytical [9][10][11][12][13] or numerical using the finite element method [7,[14][15][16]. Z-pin bridging effect is modelled by averaging the bridging forces over the entire reinforced area [9][10][11][12][14][15][16], or by the classic beam theory [11][12][13], or nonlinear springs exerting concentrated traction force at the pin location [7,[13][14]17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%