2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending performance of a sandwich beam with sheet metal pyramidal core

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact areas between the fixed compression block – bottom support plate and loading compression block – top support plate, are modelled as a surface-to-surface contact with a frictional coefficient of 0.17 corresponding to dry, in air, steel-to-steel interaction. 25 The reaction force and displacement during the simulation are expressed in the reference point corresponding to the load compression block.…”
Section: Compressive Performance Of the Hierarchical Sandwich Honeycombmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact areas between the fixed compression block – bottom support plate and loading compression block – top support plate, are modelled as a surface-to-surface contact with a frictional coefficient of 0.17 corresponding to dry, in air, steel-to-steel interaction. 25 The reaction force and displacement during the simulation are expressed in the reference point corresponding to the load compression block.…”
Section: Compressive Performance Of the Hierarchical Sandwich Honeycombmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] However, the construction of multifunctional sandwich structures through the use of traditional closed cell foam or honeycomb cores presents a challenge that is not feasible. Open-cell structures and superior design capabilities make three-dimensional (3D) periodic truss cores, such as pyramidal cores, [4][5][6] tetrahedral cores, 7,8 octet-truss cores, 9 Kagomes cores, 10 corrugated lattice cores 11 and 3D lattice metamaterials cores 12 attractive candidates for multifunctional ultralight structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the deformation performance, the lattice materials can be divided into stretchingdominated and bending-dominated structures, and the stretch-dominated structures exhibit superior stiffness and strength than the bending-dominated ones. [4] Until now, a lot of lattice structure topologies have been found such as pyramidal lattice, [5][6][7] kagome lattice structure, [8] octet lattice material, [9] tetrahedral lattice, [10] corrugated structure, [11] prismatic structure, [12] and hourglass lattice. [13] Previous investigations on the mechanical behavior of various lattice materials are mostly focused on predicting the macroscopic stiffness and strength experimentally, numerically and theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%