2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4915075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending stiffness and interlayer shear modulus of few-layer graphene

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inSandwich beam model for free vibration analysis of bilayer graphene nanoribbons with interlayer shear effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar shear stresses have been experimentally obtained for multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and graphite, demonstrating the ultralow interlayer shear interactions dominated by vdW forces [54]. Some modeling works and bending experiments have reported considerably high shear stress between graphene layers (∼0.1 GPa) due to the commensurability-dependent stick-slip friction with periodically changing peak shear stress [55,56]. Instead, the relatively lower values here can be attributed to the averaged effect caused by the limited spatial resolution of the Raman laser spot (∼1 μm).…”
Section: Prl 119 036101 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Esupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Similar shear stresses have been experimentally obtained for multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and graphite, demonstrating the ultralow interlayer shear interactions dominated by vdW forces [54]. Some modeling works and bending experiments have reported considerably high shear stress between graphene layers (∼0.1 GPa) due to the commensurability-dependent stick-slip friction with periodically changing peak shear stress [55,56]. Instead, the relatively lower values here can be attributed to the averaged effect caused by the limited spatial resolution of the Raman laser spot (∼1 μm).…”
Section: Prl 119 036101 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Esupporting
confidence: 50%
“…For four layer, the small difference between AA'B'B or AA' and AA'B'C' or ABCD is merely a result of different lattice sizes in consideration of the fact that the values of energy per atom after energy minimization for the four morphologies are nearly the same. With the participation of interlayer covalent bond which impedes shear between layers during bending process, bending modulus of silicene is expected to be more sensitive to the number of layers than graphene in actual experiment 32 . Table 1 Bending modulus (ev) of multilayer silicene with varying number of layers and stacking mode.…”
Section: Part Ii: Bending Modulus and Tensile Test Of Multilayer Silimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bending of multilayer graphene stacks have been investigated both experimentally 6,7 and theoretically 3,[8][9][10] . However, these studies have mostly focused on the interlayer shear modulus 3,6 and bending modulus 7,8 of multilayer graphene stacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies have mostly focused on the interlayer shear modulus 3,6 and bending modulus 7,8 of multilayer graphene stacks. Thus, surprisingly little effort has been invested on investigating the detailed mechanical behavior of sliding stacks and the registry changes under bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%