Plant Biomechanics 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-79099-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending Stress in Plant Stems: Models and Assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion in consistent with other studies in the literature, though most studies indirectly address the difference in sensitivity between these parameter categories. (Schulgasser and Witztum, 1992; Wegst and Ashby, 2007; Stubbs et al , 2018; (Maranville and Clegg; Von Forell et al , 2015; Robertson et al , 2016, 2017; Stubbs et al , 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion in consistent with other studies in the literature, though most studies indirectly address the difference in sensitivity between these parameter categories. (Schulgasser and Witztum, 1992; Wegst and Ashby, 2007; Stubbs et al , 2018; (Maranville and Clegg; Von Forell et al , 2015; Robertson et al , 2016, 2017; Stubbs et al , 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, computational expense was minimized by modeling only the stalk section in the vicinity of the failure region. The length of the finite element continuum model was 100 mm, which adequately captured the buckling failure modes while also minimizing Saint-Venant effects (Sandorff, 1980; Stubbs et al , 2018). Shear and bending loads were applied to the end faces of each finite element model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agreement between the finite element models and closed form solutions is strong at small displacements. At large displacements (greater than ∼45° at the tip), geometric nonlinearities that are not captured by the closed form engineering beam equations become more influential [4]. That is to say that the closed form solution is accurate so long as the linear closed form engineering beam equations are accurate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plant weight) on stalk bending strength has not been reported. Previous biomechanical plant stem models have examined the influence of morphology, material, and weight on stem failure, while others have separately analyzed the effects of externally induced bending forces (e.g., wind) on stem failure [3,4,815]. However, the effects of self-weight and external loads on stem failure are inextricably connected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation