2011
DOI: 10.1056/nejmsb1013826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending the Cost Curve in Cancer Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
255
1
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
255
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The price of therapies to treat cancer has been on an exponential rise over the past decade [32]. Of the 12 agents used in cancer care that were approved in 2012, at least nine of them were priced at over $100,000 annually [33].…”
Section: Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The price of therapies to treat cancer has been on an exponential rise over the past decade [32]. Of the 12 agents used in cancer care that were approved in 2012, at least nine of them were priced at over $100,000 annually [33].…”
Section: Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 In the United States, some leading oncologists have called for open discussions of cost-effectiveness with the appearance of new drugs with extraordinary costs and only modest benefits. 42,[51][52][53] Despite these developments, there is longstanding resistance to any form of explicit rationing of health care in the United States. Thus, it remains unlikely that US health technology assessment organizations will add cost-effectiveness criteria to their evaluations.…”
Section: Value Of Cancer Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, evidence reviews will provide context for physician and patient discussions about treatment options; trade-offs among risk, benefit, and cost; and patient preferences, such as whether to seek treatment or to shift goals to palliation or hospice care. 53,55 Along these lines, the American Society of Clinical Oncology has highlighted the importance of candid patient-physician discussions about cost considerations. 55 Linking Evidence To Payment For Cancer Therapies Finally, policy makers recognize that health technology assessment can be a blunt tool.…”
Section: Value Of Cancer Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the importance of following patients with sarcoma is widely accepted, frequent surveillance is time-consuming for both patients and physicians, increases healthcare expenditures [11,21,22], and, with respect to the use of CT scans, exposes patients to ionizing radiation [4]. Furthermore, limited evidence exists to support the intervals, modalities, or duration of monitoring [3,9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%