2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-007-0120-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending the helicoid

Abstract: We construct Colding-Minicozzi limit minimal laminations in open domains in R 3 with the singular set of C 1 -convergence being any properly embedded C 1,1 -curve. By Meeks' C 1,1 -regularity theorem, the singular set of convergence of a Colding-Minicozzi limit minimal lamination L is a locally finite collection S(L) of C 1,1 -curves that are orthogonal to the leaves of the lamination. Thus, our existence theorem gives a complete answer as to which curves appear as the singular set of a Colding-Minicozzi limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discovered by Meeks and Weber [140] and independently by Mira [149], these are complete, immersed minimal annuli H n ⊂ R 3 with two non-embedded ends and finite total curvature; each of the surfaces H n contains the unit circle S 1 in the (x 1 , x 2 )-plane, and a neighborhood of S 1 in H n contains an embedded annulus H n which approximates, for n large, a highly spinning helicoid whose usual straight axis has been periodically bent into the unit circle S 1 (thus the name of bent helicoids); see Figure 2, right. Furthermore, the H n converge as n → ∞ to the foliation of R 3 minus the x 3 -axis by vertical half-planes with boundary the x 3 -axis, and with S 1 as the 1 that spins an arbitrary number n of times around the circle.…”
Section: The Bent Helicoidsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discovered by Meeks and Weber [140] and independently by Mira [149], these are complete, immersed minimal annuli H n ⊂ R 3 with two non-embedded ends and finite total curvature; each of the surfaces H n contains the unit circle S 1 in the (x 1 , x 2 )-plane, and a neighborhood of S 1 in H n contains an embedded annulus H n which approximates, for n large, a highly spinning helicoid whose usual straight axis has been periodically bent into the unit circle S 1 (thus the name of bent helicoids); see Figure 2, right. Furthermore, the H n converge as n → ∞ to the foliation of R 3 minus the x 3 -axis by vertical half-planes with boundary the x 3 -axis, and with S 1 as the 1 that spins an arbitrary number n of times around the circle.…”
Section: The Bent Helicoidsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This construction also makes sense when n is half an integer; in the case n = 1 2 , H 1/2 is the double cover of the Meeks minimal Möbius strip described in the previous example. The bent helicoids H n play an important role in proving the converse of Meeks' C 1,1 -Regularity Theorem (Theorem 9.6 below) for the singular set of convergence in a Colding-Minicozzi limit minimal lamination (for this converse, see Meeks and Weber [140]). …”
Section: The Bent Helicoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bent helicoids along a generating curve have been studied quite a lot recently. Although we do not aim here to summarize any recent developments, in support to our claim we would like to remind just one direction of study, since bent helicoids along a circle play a central role in [17] as well as in [1]. This idea will motivate our Example 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(1) Comparing with the bending helicoids in Euclidean space [11], and for small values of v, our examples give embedded strips of maximal surfaces only α is not a full circle, that is, only when α is a piece of length less than 2π because V (t) is not a periodic function. A way to get a periodic vector field V (t) is replacing the function ϕ(t) in (2) by a periodic function, as for example, ϕ(t) = cos(t).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 94%