2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beneficial effects of Coomassie staining on proteomic analysis employing PAGE separation followed with whole-gel slicing, in-gel digestion and quantitative LC-MS/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the Coomassie‐staining on the identification of proteins in the mass range from 10 kDa to 600 kDa by GeLC‐MS was investigated earlier. [ 24 ] It was shown that significantly more proteins below 40 kDa were identified after staining compared to only fixing the gel. This observation was explained by the binding of Coomassie to the proteins, resulting in a lower diffusion due to the larger volume of the Coomassie‐protein‐complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the Coomassie‐staining on the identification of proteins in the mass range from 10 kDa to 600 kDa by GeLC‐MS was investigated earlier. [ 24 ] It was shown that significantly more proteins below 40 kDa were identified after staining compared to only fixing the gel. This observation was explained by the binding of Coomassie to the proteins, resulting in a lower diffusion due to the larger volume of the Coomassie‐protein‐complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority of mass spectrometric surveys are carried out with peptides and proteins that are isolated by gel-free systems, top-down proteomics routinely employs one-dimensional or two-dimensional gel electrophoretic techniques, or biochemical isolation methods such as affinity chromatography, for the preparation of intact proteoforms. As summarized in Figure 2, gel-based top-down proteomics can be based on GeLC-MS/MS using one-dimensional gradient gels in combination with liquid chromatography [97][98][99] or classical two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using isoelectric focusing in the first dimension and slab gel electrophoresis in the second dimension [100][101][102]. A gel-based method that has overcome the technical limitation of gel-to-gel variations is represented by two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) [103][104][105].…”
Section: Sample Handling and Protein Extraction For Gel-based And Top...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we have reported on MS-based profiling of proteins on nondenaturing 1DE or 2DE gels. By combining lane slicing or grid cutting and quantitative LC–MS/MS, gel distributions could be reconstructed for all the identified proteins, and the analysis based on pattern correlation and bioinformatics provided abundant information on complex formation and subunit structures. Compared with nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE provides better analysis for insoluble proteins, and also the dissociated polypeptides could be directly correlated with gene products and their proteoforms. Therefore, in this work, we aimed to examine if a method coupling SDS-PAGE with systematic LC–MS/MS could provide extra information that correlates with proteoforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%