2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beneficial Effects of Population Bottlenecks in an RNA Virus Evolving at Increased Error Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is similar to previous findings with a variety RNA viruses exposed to nucleoside analogues (5,8,9,11,15,30,31,39,55) although here we failed to trigger lethal mutagenesis. Higher efficiency of 5-FU incorporation into RNA than into DNA may offer an explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is similar to previous findings with a variety RNA viruses exposed to nucleoside analogues (5,8,9,11,15,30,31,39,55) although here we failed to trigger lethal mutagenesis. Higher efficiency of 5-FU incorporation into RNA than into DNA may offer an explanation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Another possible explanation for our inability to sufficiently debilitate the virus is that the founder clone was highly nonadapted. Work with X174 and other viruses has shown that serial passaging at low population sizes tends to favor the accumulation of deleterious mutations but fails to reduce fitness in already debilitated viruses because beneficial mutations are more frequent in low-fitness genetic backgrounds and can offset the effects of deleterious mutation accumulation (8,38,56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant increase in the mutation rate has been, indeed, successful to cause the extinction of infectivity in many different viral systems (20,21), although the mechanisms through which extinction supervenes are diverse and related to a variety of molecular and population responses (22). In particular, increased mutagenesis can also bear beneficial effects for viral populations through an enhancement of their diversity, which promotes adaptation of low-fitness viruses (23) and facilitates the appearance of resistance mutants when an inhibitor of viral replication is present (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above considerations indicate that it can depend on the environment, on the population size and on other parameters such as the diffusion of the virus in the medium in which it propagates. Spatial constraints, that are rarely taken into account (Altmeyer & McCaskill 2001;Aguirre & Manrubia 2008) can condition the degree of competition among genomes, the capacity of the virus to infect new cells and the degree of preservation of the resulting mutants, which have higher chances of surviving as diffusion decreases (Cases-González et al 2008). The critical mutation rate has a genetic component (determined by the actual mutation rate, the type of mutants produced and the interactions established among them) and a demographic component, ascribed to reductions in the population size caused by the deleterious effects that most mutations have on fitness.…”
Section: The Critical Mutation Rate: a Relative Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%