2018
DOI: 10.18504/10.18504/pl2652-009-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beneficios compartidos y la gobernanza de la extracción de recursos naturales en territorios indígenas: aportes y limitaciones para Latinoamérica

Abstract: Los beneficios compartidos corresponden a una modalidad reciente de gobernanza de la extracción de recursos naturales en territorios indígenas en la que las industrias extractivas comparten directamente con las comunidades afectadas una parte de los beneficios obtenidos en sus operaciones. En el centro del debate se encuentra el tema del rol del Estado ante los proyectos extractivos, el carácter asimétrico de las negociaciones directas entre comunidades e industrias extractivas, sus reales resultados para las … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, with few exceptions, the literature on agreements between Indigenous peoples and mining companies tends to treat agreements as discrete phenomena, rather than placing them in a wider historical and political context, and to see them as being driven primarily by extractive companies wishing to fulfil CSR obligations and achieve community support for projects. The retraction of state protections of citizens’ and Indigenous peoples’ rights under neoliberal governance draws the focus of many authors, rather than the question of Indigenous strategies in the face of these conditions (except where those strategies involve resistance to mining) or the use of agreements as part of these strategies (Bustamante‐Rivera and Martin, 2018). Conversely, works such as Vela‐Almeida et al.…”
Section: Indigenous Rights Extractive Industry and Negotiated Agreementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, with few exceptions, the literature on agreements between Indigenous peoples and mining companies tends to treat agreements as discrete phenomena, rather than placing them in a wider historical and political context, and to see them as being driven primarily by extractive companies wishing to fulfil CSR obligations and achieve community support for projects. The retraction of state protections of citizens’ and Indigenous peoples’ rights under neoliberal governance draws the focus of many authors, rather than the question of Indigenous strategies in the face of these conditions (except where those strategies involve resistance to mining) or the use of agreements as part of these strategies (Bustamante‐Rivera and Martin, 2018). Conversely, works such as Vela‐Almeida et al.…”
Section: Indigenous Rights Extractive Industry and Negotiated Agreementsmentioning
confidence: 99%