2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit estimation of transport projects—a representative consumer approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The even-numbered columns of Table 1 show studies with a utility function approach instead of a benefit function approach. Kidokoro [30][31][32] and Parry and Bento [33] succeeded in a utility function approach on a simple network, noting that perfect substitution and logit type substitution are a special form of a utility function (see column 6 of Table 1). In particular, Kidokoro [31] deals with a homogeneous consumer model, which is a quasi-linear utility function.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The even-numbered columns of Table 1 show studies with a utility function approach instead of a benefit function approach. Kidokoro [30][31][32] and Parry and Bento [33] succeeded in a utility function approach on a simple network, noting that perfect substitution and logit type substitution are a special form of a utility function (see column 6 of Table 1). In particular, Kidokoro [31] deals with a homogeneous consumer model, which is a quasi-linear utility function.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kidokoro [30][31][32] and Parry and Bento [33] succeeded in a utility function approach on a simple network, noting that perfect substitution and logit type substitution are a special form of a utility function (see column 6 of Table 1). In particular, Kidokoro [31] deals with a homogeneous consumer model, which is a quasi-linear utility function. However, Kidokoro [30][31][32] does not deal with full networks.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como se deduce de los coeficientes estimados, la valoración del tiempo de viaje obtenida con el modelo ML da como resultado 23,89 $/ min, en tanto que el modelo ICLV da como resultado 65,18 $/min, siendo este último un valor más razonable si se compara con los resultados de otros estudios (ver, por ejemplo, Márquez, 2013). Este es un hallazgo de gran interés, dado el importante papel que desempeña la valoración del tiempo en la evaluación de los proyectos de transporte (Brown y Ryan, 2011), donde gran parte de los beneficios consisten precisamente en ahorros de tiempo (Kidokoro, 2006;Lakshmanan et al, 2001). …”
Section: Tabla 3 Coeficientes Estimados De Los Modelosunclassified
“…The advantages of scale economies occur as firms consolidate production and distribution sites, increase outputs [15] as well as obtain the possibility to increase the competitive advantage. However, despite large amounts invested on roads, there is still little known about their benefits [19]. In fact, the argument that the improvements of transport infrastructure changes travel costs and benefits the stockholders in the commodity market is not neglected.…”
Section: The Effects Of Highway Infrastructure Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many approaches to solve this equation for the price p. Our approach is based on the numerical solution by the Newton method applied to equivalent equation (19) as all of the parameters in our research had numerical values. Basic calculation results are presented in fig.…”
Section: Introduction To Evaluation Of Road Transport Infrastructure mentioning
confidence: 99%