2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-018-2230-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit evaluation for ocean engineering based on grey Euclid model of game compromise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also applied to the comprehensive evaluation of investment projects after the correlation with economic factors, which provides a strong basis for the decision-making of environmental investment [8]. The grey Euclid model of game compromise is used by Tu (2018) to evaluate the building and analysis of marine engineering item of a construction company, and the risk factors of project personnel management and environment are analyzed [9]. It shows that more and more experts and scholars have carried out evaluation research on investment projects and proposed more evaluation models, but the research on benefit prediction model of investment projects is still in the exploratory stage.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Invested Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also applied to the comprehensive evaluation of investment projects after the correlation with economic factors, which provides a strong basis for the decision-making of environmental investment [8]. The grey Euclid model of game compromise is used by Tu (2018) to evaluate the building and analysis of marine engineering item of a construction company, and the risk factors of project personnel management and environment are analyzed [9]. It shows that more and more experts and scholars have carried out evaluation research on investment projects and proposed more evaluation models, but the research on benefit prediction model of investment projects is still in the exploratory stage.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Invested Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al [37] Masinia et al [38] Salo et al [39] Jin et al [40] Prostean et al [41] Balks et al [42] Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Policy risk…”
Section: Snmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology development risk Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] e [ Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al [47] Tu et al [48] Frq Lin Yanshuo [43] Gatzer t et al [44] Rolik et al [45] Dimitrios et al [46] Xu et al…”
Section: Snmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations