2012
DOI: 10.1186/cc11886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit of low-dose aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in septic patients

Abstract: Analyzing medical records of 979 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock provided some evidence that the use of low-dose aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with decreased hospital mortality. However, the benefit was abolished when aspirin and NSAIDs were given together.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we are the first to report a meta-analysis of clinical studies demonstrating an association between ASA and diminished risk of ARDS in critically-ill patients at risk for acute lung injury. Although our results are in line with data from studies with ASA in other inflammatory conditions, (5456) the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. General limitations of the clinical studies include lack of information regarding ASA dose, lack of control of prehospital vs. in hospital ASA use and the bias or confounding inherent to observational studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, we are the first to report a meta-analysis of clinical studies demonstrating an association between ASA and diminished risk of ARDS in critically-ill patients at risk for acute lung injury. Although our results are in line with data from studies with ASA in other inflammatory conditions, (5456) the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. General limitations of the clinical studies include lack of information regarding ASA dose, lack of control of prehospital vs. in hospital ASA use and the bias or confounding inherent to observational studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A retrospective study of 979 septic patients (mean APACHE II score 22–23, p=0.16) showed mortality benefit from aspirin 44. Logistic regression analysis determined that being on aspirin or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID; ibuprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin) was associated with decreased mortality (aspirin (ASA) OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83, NSAID OR 0.5, CI 0.26 to 0.94); however, being on both agents eliminated the benefit of either agent (ASA and NSAID OR 1.12, CI 0.55 to 2.25), indicating that NSAID use must be considered in clinical trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies provided individual-level data on aspirin use, allowing this exposure variable to be used for the primary analysis (79, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21). In one study, it was not possible to disaggregate aspirin use from that of other antiplatelets in the hospital-based cohort (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%