2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04037.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits and strengths of the disproportionality analysis for identification of adverse drug reactions in a pharmacovigilance database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
373
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
373
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) represents a direct measure of the strength of a safety signal. A PRR is the ratio of the proportion of all reported cases of the event of interest among people exposed to a particular drug compared with the corresponding proportion among people exposed to all or several other drugs [6]. The breakdown of PRR can be seen in the equation: = ( / + )/( / + ) This algorithm helps with avoiding biases caused by varying details in reports.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) represents a direct measure of the strength of a safety signal. A PRR is the ratio of the proportion of all reported cases of the event of interest among people exposed to a particular drug compared with the corresponding proportion among people exposed to all or several other drugs [6]. The breakdown of PRR can be seen in the equation: = ( / + )/( / + ) This algorithm helps with avoiding biases caused by varying details in reports.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is only the convergence of proofs which allows final conclusions and decisions in pharmacovigilance. Thus, the notion of 'levels of evidence', widely used for evaluating drug efficacy, cannot be actually applied in the field of ADRs; all methods are of interest in the evaluation of ADRs [16].…”
Section: Pharmacovigilance Tools: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some benefits and strengths of using DMAs are undisputed, since they are quick and inexpensive analyses routinely performed by regulators and researchers for drug safety evaluation [16]. Apart from the hypothesisgenerating purpose of signal detection, other important application of this method are (a) validation of a pharmacological hypothesis about the mechanism of occurrence of ADRs [58]; (b) characterization of the safety profile of drugs [59].…”
Section: Dmas: Current Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important methodological question when considering the special section in this month's issue of the Journal featuring a study of disproportionality analysis in assessing spontaneous reports [9]. Here, in two related commentaries we draw attention to the debate surrounding the increasing use of disproportionality analysis, and emphasize for our readers, the pros and cons of such methods [10,11].The evaluation of relative or absolute risks from the numerous spontaneous reporting databanks has so far been hindered by the lack of information on number of people exposed to the drug, thus making it almost impossible to determine accurately if the excess of reports of a specific adverse event with a particular drug (relative to other similar drugs) was due to greater numbers of patients taking the drug or a genuine reflection of a higher potential incidence for harm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%