2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6631041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of an active spine supported bounding locomotion with a small compliant quadruped robot

Abstract: Abstract-We studied the effect of the control of an active spine versus a fixed spine, on a quadruped robot running in bound gait. Active spine supported actuation led to faster locomotion, with less foot sliding on the ground, and a higher stability to go straight forward. However, we did no observe an improvement of cost of transport of the spine-actuated, faster robot system compared to the rigid spine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of that simulation justified our hypothesis that the energy efficiency can be improved using nonlinear spine compliance. Moreover, we are in the process of experimenting our ideas on a real robot; see [20,21]. Also check [38] for more discussions on the nonlinear compliance in robotic applications.…”
Section: Modeling and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of that simulation justified our hypothesis that the energy efficiency can be improved using nonlinear spine compliance. Moreover, we are in the process of experimenting our ideas on a real robot; see [20,21]. Also check [38] for more discussions on the nonlinear compliance in robotic applications.…”
Section: Modeling and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For another comparative research between rigid and flexible spine see [19]. Recently we introduced Bobcat, a small-size quadruped robot with flexible spine [20] (see Fig. 1(b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was able to perform stable locomotion in different motion patterns. With focus on leg design, robot platforms such as Scout II [3], Cheetah-cub robot [4], and Bobcat-robot [5] perform in different classes of speed and cost of transport (Table I). Videos published by the development teams show the MIT Cheetah (v = 6.1m/s [6]) and the Boston Dynamics Cheetah (v = 12.6m/s / no other scientific data available) or the Boston Dynamics Wildcat (7.15m/s/ no other scientific data available) give new outlines of maximum speed reachable in legged-robotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of power-autonomous quadrupeds utilizing parallel stiffness is presented in [9] and [10]. Other experiments have suggested increased running speed [11] and gait transition stability [12]. Leaping from a crouched position with a parallel elastic-actuated spine was shown to increase leap energy in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%