2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of cardiac sonography performed by a non-expert sonographer in patients with non-traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…International guidelines recommend the use of point-of-care ultrasound, 1 which is extremely helpful in this timedependent context, being able to identify some of the treatable causes of cardiac arrest (Fig 2) and to guide the therapeutic approach. [2][3][4] The guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients accordingly recommend the use of ultrasound in case of PEA or asystolic CA. First, the physician should differentiate true PEA from pseudo-PEA 5 : the latter shows residual wall motion and may benefit from longer resuscitation, while true PEA has a poorer outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…International guidelines recommend the use of point-of-care ultrasound, 1 which is extremely helpful in this timedependent context, being able to identify some of the treatable causes of cardiac arrest (Fig 2) and to guide the therapeutic approach. [2][3][4] The guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients accordingly recommend the use of ultrasound in case of PEA or asystolic CA. First, the physician should differentiate true PEA from pseudo-PEA 5 : the latter shows residual wall motion and may benefit from longer resuscitation, while true PEA has a poorer outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Ultrasound should then differentiate potential treatable causes of CA. 4,5 Ultrasound may identify an acutely dilated RV corresponding to acute cor pulmonale, severely impaired LV frequently associated with ischemic disease, small and hyperkinetic ventricles indicating severe hypovolemia, or tamponade of the right-hand cavities by a pericardial effusion. 5 The findings should be confirmed in more than one view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, these signs are a product of a large flow-obstructing PE altering hemodynamic physiology in the presence of spontaneous circulation, a factor that is not present at CA. However, several case reports and observational studies have reported that, even during CA, PE can still be identified using the same signs of disproportionate RV size and direct embolism visualization in the pulmonary artery, right atrium, or IVC as a homogenously echogenic structure independent of underlying anatomy (suggestive of thrombus presence [21][22][23][24][25]. Such findings may lead to change in management including use of thrombolysis, an intervention that could largely benefit mortality in these patients [26,27].…”
Section: Pulmonary Embolus With Acute Cor Pulmonalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case reports have shown handheld Doppler US devices can allow for faster pulse checks in patients during in-hospital CA [62]. Other authors have already reported the utility of US performed concomitantly with pulse palpation to be effective in identifying perfusing heart rhythms [21]. While US in this exact context is not yet well studied, it seems of little risk but some benefit to use US to eliminate some of this intrinsic inaccuracy in pulse palpation during CA resuscitation.…”
Section: Us To Guide Pulse Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3, 5, 7, 8, 16] Some advocate using this to aid decision making, and in one prior work the only way in which POCUS findings altered treatment was in prompting the team to stop CPR when cardiac standstill was seen. [15] A systematic review however injects a note of caution, concluding that cardiac standstill “harbors a significantly lower (but not zero) likelihood that a patient will experience ROSC.” [6] The authors of the review conclude that POCUS can inform prognosis but should not be used in isolation to make decisions on stopping CPR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%